From fc8f7a0075818b650f0a2f6b555159e796e1d130 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonas Kümmerlin <jonas@kuemmerlin.eu>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:34:47 +0200
Subject: fix oversight in fallback buffered paint implementation

and make label use it more efficiently

how the fuck was this not noticed before?
---
 alf/alflabel.cpp | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

(limited to 'alf/alflabel.cpp')

diff --git a/alf/alflabel.cpp b/alf/alflabel.cpp
index 0a47d58..4643c3f 100644
--- a/alf/alflabel.cpp
+++ b/alf/alflabel.cpp
@@ -222,12 +222,8 @@ ALF_Label_WindowProc(HWND hwnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
         PAINTSTRUCT ps;
         HDC hdc = BeginPaint(hwnd, &ps);
 
-        RECT rcClient;
-        GetClientRect(hwnd, &rcClient);
-        RECT rcPaint = { 0, 0, rcClient.right - rcClient.left, rcClient.bottom - rcClient.top };
-
         HDC hdcBuffer = NULL;
-        ALF_Compat_HPAINTBUFFER hpb = ALF_Compat_BeginBufferedPaint(hdc, &rcPaint, 0, NULL, &hdcBuffer);
+        ALF_Compat_HPAINTBUFFER hpb = ALF_Compat_BeginBufferedPaint(hdc, &ps.rcPaint, 0, NULL, &hdcBuffer);
         if (hpb) {
             ALF_Label_Paint(hwnd, priv, hdcBuffer, &ps.rcPaint);
             ALF_Compat_EndBufferedPaint(hpb, TRUE);
-- 
cgit v1.2.3